Skip to Main Content
Need Support? Let’s guide you to the right answer or agent.
ADD A NEW IDEA

3D Modeling

Showing 153

Modify Solids - By Face - Edge on selection improvements

Mstn has great 3d solids tools. But, these tools are very difficult to use in plan and section views where the face to be modified is only visible edge on. Eg - place a linear solid (wall) in top (plan) view. Very common. Then try to extend the le...
over 2 years ago in 3D Modeling 0 Needs review

Clip volume overexposed surfaces in Bentley View

Hello, if I use the clip volume tool my predefined Display Style changes into overexposed surfaces. Because the drawing seeds of the clip volume are not so well matched. This has the consequence that edges and corners are very difficult to see. Ye...
over 3 years ago in 3D Modeling 0 Needs review

ACS: ACS by Element Update

Transfered from EAP Ideas listDefine ACS by Element should recognise or infer a bit more: Cylinders: hovering over a cylinder should offer the option to align z with the axis or extrusion path. At the moment, hovering on the 'caped surface' disc a...
over 3 years ago in 3D Modeling 0 Future consideration

Apply Clip Volume tool - SmartSolids

The Apply Clip Volume tool recognises Solids and closed elements like Shapes.Could the ACV tool be enhanced to allow it to recognise planar faces of SmartSolids and other 'difficult' elements like ABD's TF Forms and Meshes.This would make it a lot...
over 3 years ago in 3D Modeling 0 Will not implement

View independent lock only X, Y or Z

Hi!View independent is an amazing tool, but! It would be even more amazing to be able to lock the independecy to either X, Y or Z.For example:I would like to put trees that look the same from all angles but that are only a 2D representation of tha...
over 3 years ago in 3D Modeling 2 Already exists

Parametric Solids Quantification Fix

Mstn was pioneering in providing solid modeling to the AEC market. But the Parasolids kernel has its origins in the MCAD world. Reporting volumes and areas is great, but in the AEC world, we need to be able to able to break things down further. Fo...
over 3 years ago in 3D Modeling 2 Will not implement

Parametric association for arraying along a path

It would be cool to have a tool that would allow us to array along a path (smartline, bspline, etc.) and then update as we change the path. For instance, I can extrude a profile along a path and then modify that path and not have to rerun the extr...
over 3 years ago in 3D Modeling 1 Already exists

Add "No Stitch" option to Bridge Mesh & Merge Edge tools

I would prefer the stitching aspect of these tools be optional.I often just want to close a gap between two meshes without actually stitching them together.
over 3 years ago in 3D Modeling 0 Will not implement

Extrude profiles along multiple paths in one move

I would like to be able to extrude a series of profiles along a series of paths in one move. Imagine you have defined the paths, added the profiles to the end of the profiles and in one move extrude them along the paths. Currently this is a per pa...
about 2 months ago in 3D Modeling 0 Future consideration

Bing maps -> More Options

Hello Bentley, The new addition of Bing Maps is great as well as being fast to load the tiles. Currently we have 4 options. But in future revisions would there be space for more granular options, similar to GIS options? Like turning off content we...
about 2 months ago in 3D Modeling 0 Will not implement